Cohort explorer
Review eligibility rules, attrition, baseline characteristics, missingness and follow-up together. Export the selected cohort definition with each summary.
Useful for: feasibility discussions and reviewing analysis populations.
Independent support for life science teams.Making evidence clear and reproducible.Working with you from brief to delivery.
I’m Sai Prasad Jandhyala. Since 2006, I’ve worked across clinical programming and evidence generation. My background spans oncology, immunology, infectious diseases, neuroscience and rare diseases. I help teams connect reliable analysis, practical applications and clear technical review.
EXPERTISE, APPLIED
From a defined programming work package to a focused technical review, work directly with the person delivering it.
Hands-on SAS programming for clinical reporting teams that need clear specifications, reliable outputs and an experienced collaborator.
Explore service 02 / EXPERTISEPurpose-built R workflows and Shiny applications that bring clinical, operational and analytical questions into focus.
Explore service 03 / EXPERTISEFocused Python and R/Shiny application development for statistical programming and RWE teams, scoped around your workflow and agreed with your statistical leads.
Explore service 04 / EXPERTISEProgramming support for observational research, with explicit cohort definitions, provenance and reproducible transformations.
Explore service 05 / EXPERTISEPractical data science with attention to the assumptions, evaluation and engineering around the model.
Explore service 06 / EXPERTISEIndependent technical assessment of AI and machine-learning implementations, from data preparation to human oversight.
Explore serviceAPPLICATIONS FOR STATISTICAL PROGRAMMING
Focused Python and R/Shiny applications, designed with your statisticians and programming team around a defined workflow.
Review eligibility rules, attrition, baseline characteristics, missingness and follow-up together. Export the selected cohort definition with each summary.
Useful for: feasibility discussions and reviewing analysis populations.
Compare dataset versions, highlight metadata changes, review SAS logs and track discrepancies against a specification.
Useful for: repeatable QC and focused vendor reviews.
Run agreed descriptive summaries and reporting templates through controlled inputs, with visible denominators, data versions and downloadable outputs.
Useful for: consistent recurring analyses and transparent handover.
Example build scopes for discussion. Each application needs agreed calculations, validation and access controls before operational use.
Explore Python & R application supportRESPONSIBLE INNOVATION
Speed matters. So do traceability, validation and human judgement. I help organisations examine the evidence behind their AI and ML implementations.
Explore AI assuranceIDEAS FROM THE WORKBENCH
Article · AI & ML
The valuable question is not how quickly a model writes code. It is how confidently a team can review the result.
Read insightArticle · R & Shiny
A dashboard is only useful when users understand the data, the calculations and the decisions it supports.
Read insightArticle · Real-world evidence
Index dates, eligibility and follow-up can change the answer before a statistical model is fitted.
Read insightA CONVERSATION IS A GOOD START
Tell me about the challenge. Let’s define a practical way forward.